Bihar has once again found itself in the spotlight of electoral politics, with the Election Commission’s Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter rolls sparking debates, concerns, and fresh controversies ahead of the 2025 Assembly elections. The exercise, which aims to clean up the state’s electoral rolls, has already resulted in the removal of a staggering 65 lakh names at the draft stage. According to the EC, these deletions were linked to voters marked as deceased, permanently relocated, untraceable, or registered in more than one constituency.
However, the process has not been without pushback. With just two days left before the September 1 deadline for claims and objections, nearly 30,000 voters whose names were struck off have already sought reinstatement. These electors argue that their removal was unjustified and that they remain eligible to exercise their democratic right. Alongside them, more than 13.33 lakh young citizens who recently turned 18 have submitted enrolment forms, hoping to cast their first vote in the upcoming elections.
The scale of this revision is unprecedented in Bihar’s electoral history. The EC had mandated that all 7.89 crore registered voters fill out enumeration forms by July 25 to be included in the draft roll published on August 1. The draft list eventually featured 7.24 crore names, reflecting the removal of those 65 lakh entries. For the first time, the EC also introduced a stricter requirement: applicants registering after 2003 must provide official proof of date and/or place of birth to establish citizenship, while those born after July 1, 1987 must also produce documents of their parents. This shift aligns with the provisions of the Citizenship Act, 1955, but it marks a departure from past practice, where self-declaration of citizenship was deemed sufficient.
Unsurprisingly, this new requirement has triggered unease and legal challenges. Critics argue that the EC’s order risks disenfranchising genuine voters, particularly the poor and marginalized who may struggle to produce such documents. Several petitions have been filed in the Supreme Court, which is set to hear the matter on September 1. For many, this legal scrutiny will determine not just the fate of those already struck off but also the larger question of how citizenship and voting rights should be validated in India’s democracy.
The political implications of this exercise are immense. Bihar, with its history of migration, shifting demographics, and intense caste-based politics, is already a state where electoral rolls carry heavy political weight. The sudden deletion of lakhs of names has created suspicion that the revision could tilt the playing field in favour of certain groups while marginalizing others. For ruling and opposition parties alike, the stakes could not be higher, as the composition of the voter list has the potential to shape electoral outcomes.
While the Election Commission maintains that the exercise is aimed purely at accuracy and fairness, the sheer scale of deletions, combined with the new documentation rules, has made the SIR not just an administrative process but a deeply political flashpoint. The final rolls, to be published on September 30, will therefore not simply be a list of voters—they will represent the culmination of a contested process that touches on questions of identity, citizenship, and the very foundations of electoral democracy in Bihar.
.jpeg)
